<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 18 November 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver Bells&#8230; or Circles &#171; from Sneakers to Stilettos</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-8238</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver Bells&#8230; or Circles &#171; from Sneakers to Stilettos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-8238</guid>
		<description>[...] it looked on others and have been very unsure about it. Here are some examples of others doing this here and here. So this morning after I put the skirt and top together, I felt like I needed more color. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it looked on others and have been very unsure about it. Here are some examples of others doing this here and here. So this morning after I put the skirt and top together, I felt like I needed more color. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7977</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7977</guid>
		<description>Very sophisticated.  =)  fyi- I linked to this post on my blog.  Just wanted to let you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very sophisticated.  =)  fyi- I linked to this post on my blog.  Just wanted to let you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>I love that scarf!  This is a great look on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that scarf!  This is a great look on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadine</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting discussion! I just love what you&#039;re wearing - the long vertical lines and black-and-white palette are fantastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting discussion! I just love what you&#8217;re wearing &#8211; the long vertical lines and black-and-white palette are fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctoressa</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7878</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctoressa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7878</guid>
		<description>Gorgeous combination - you have such a knack for the visually interesting monochrome look.

And such marvelous moderation on the thorny issue of gender and clothes by both you and S! I&#039;ve found the discussion to be very interesting.  I love the portrait of Louis XIV in full regalia to make the same point to my students: long curly hair, exposed calves, high-heeled red shoes, yards of lace = masculine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous combination &#8211; you have such a knack for the visually interesting monochrome look.</p>
<p>And such marvelous moderation on the thorny issue of gender and clothes by both you and S! I&#8217;ve found the discussion to be very interesting.  I love the portrait of Louis XIV in full regalia to make the same point to my students: long curly hair, exposed calves, high-heeled red shoes, yards of lace = masculine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7873</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7873</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d somehow missed that you referred to your jeans as &quot;girlfriend jeans&quot;! Ahhh, A, you rock. And I love seeing that belt in action!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d somehow missed that you referred to your jeans as &#8220;girlfriend jeans&#8221;! Ahhh, A, you rock. And I love seeing that belt in action!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: missrobin</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7871</link>
		<dc:creator>missrobin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7871</guid>
		<description>Elegant, classy, sophisticated, timeless.
You wear it well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elegant, classy, sophisticated, timeless.<br />
You wear it well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7870</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7870</guid>
		<description>Pretty outfit! 

I also hate the ridiculous names given to clothing, not just because of the gendered notions, but because of the manipulative marketing. A &quot;boyfriend jean&quot; is big and slouchy. If I wanted a bigger and slouchier jean than what I&#039;d normally wear, I&#039;d buy a size up. Or I&#039;d go DIY and actually wear my boyfriend&#039;s jeans! But these jeans are most likely priced higher than the &quot;normal,&quot; non-trendy jean one would normally purchase. 

As far as pronouns go, I try to be specific whenever possible. If I don&#039;t know, I tend to use her/she. As a side note to this discussion, I&#039;m an English student, and I&#039;ve read in a few articles/books on writing that &quot;they&quot; is becoming acceptable for use as a singular pronoun in order to avoid gender distinctions. I have mixed feelings about this personally, but it&#039;s an interesting solution. 

Also, if I may make a suggestion, another great way to show your students how what we consider masculine/feminine changes would be with some old rock concert clips. The male rock star (Mick Jagger, Robert Plant, etc.)is often used as an example of ultimate masculinity, but in the sixties and seventies men often wore ruffles and flowers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty outfit! </p>
<p>I also hate the ridiculous names given to clothing, not just because of the gendered notions, but because of the manipulative marketing. A &#8220;boyfriend jean&#8221; is big and slouchy. If I wanted a bigger and slouchier jean than what I&#8217;d normally wear, I&#8217;d buy a size up. Or I&#8217;d go DIY and actually wear my boyfriend&#8217;s jeans! But these jeans are most likely priced higher than the &#8220;normal,&#8221; non-trendy jean one would normally purchase. </p>
<p>As far as pronouns go, I try to be specific whenever possible. If I don&#8217;t know, I tend to use her/she. As a side note to this discussion, I&#8217;m an English student, and I&#8217;ve read in a few articles/books on writing that &#8220;they&#8221; is becoming acceptable for use as a singular pronoun in order to avoid gender distinctions. I have mixed feelings about this personally, but it&#8217;s an interesting solution. </p>
<p>Also, if I may make a suggestion, another great way to show your students how what we consider masculine/feminine changes would be with some old rock concert clips. The male rock star (Mick Jagger, Robert Plant, etc.)is often used as an example of ultimate masculinity, but in the sixties and seventies men often wore ruffles and flowers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7869</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7869</guid>
		<description>I am so pleased that this is your outfit today because I&#039;d been hoping to tell you ladies what I&#039;ve been doing this week. 

Monday and Tuesday I inadvertently wore shades of black and white. After those two days I decided to do that the rest of the week and it is much more difficult than I would have expected!

Your all black and white outfit looks amazing, but I challenge you to try and do it for a full week. It really has put me in a sort of down/calm mood the whole week. 

Looking good, as always!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so pleased that this is your outfit today because I&#8217;d been hoping to tell you ladies what I&#8217;ve been doing this week. </p>
<p>Monday and Tuesday I inadvertently wore shades of black and white. After those two days I decided to do that the rest of the week and it is much more difficult than I would have expected!</p>
<p>Your all black and white outfit looks amazing, but I challenge you to try and do it for a full week. It really has put me in a sort of down/calm mood the whole week. </p>
<p>Looking good, as always!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Historiadora de Moda</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7867</link>
		<dc:creator>La Historiadora de Moda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/11/18/18-november-2009-2/#comment-7867</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really happy that you all have brought up this discussion in these recent posts.  It was interesting to read Cosmo&#039;s comments about marketing, etc. even though calling jeans &quot;boyfriend&quot; jeans or &quot;the diva&quot; is more apt to make me less likely rather than more likely to buy the jeans in question.  I too prefer more specific terms, such as floral, whimsical, romantic, fluttery, natural, geometric, bold, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really happy that you all have brought up this discussion in these recent posts.  It was interesting to read Cosmo&#8217;s comments about marketing, etc. even though calling jeans &#8220;boyfriend&#8221; jeans or &#8220;the diva&#8221; is more apt to make me less likely rather than more likely to buy the jeans in question.  I too prefer more specific terms, such as floral, whimsical, romantic, fluttery, natural, geometric, bold, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

