<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 23 October 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:22:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matilde</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-8105</link>
		<dc:creator>Matilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-8105</guid>
		<description>This outfit is lovely, and would be a great teaching outfit once you have the job.  However, this outfit will not do for a job interview.  

I&#039;m in economics, but I&#039;ve interviewed lots of candidates and have many friends in other fields.  It is almost universally true that the standard for junior job candidates in academia is a suit.  Most people who insist otherwise are usually other graduate students, not people who sit on lots of hiring committees.  Every stylish person should have a suit in their wardrobe anyway, so consider this an occasion to invest in one.

While a job interview is not a place to showcase your fashion sense, that doesn&#039;t mean you can&#039;t use it to your advantage.  A suit can be everything from dowdy to smashing.  The first thing is getting the right suit.  A well-cut, modern, flattering suit is the key.  This means trying on multiple suits and using a tailor. And don&#039;t scrimp - this is an investment piece.  Cheap suiting fabric wrinkles easily, the labels don&#039;t lie flat, and they don&#039;t hold up well after multiple dry-cleanings.  You&#039;ll be mixing these pieces in your professional wardrobe for years, so don&#039;t consider this a one-time purchase.

Once you&#039;ve got the perfect suit, you can subtlely give it a little personality.  In a creative field you can get away with a pretty patterned blouse and earings.  At a B-school interview play it conservative with a fitted menswear shirt in a flattering color.  Universally great things to style a suit are a great haircut, smashing eyewear, a decent manicure, and a nice watch.

My two cents, M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This outfit is lovely, and would be a great teaching outfit once you have the job.  However, this outfit will not do for a job interview.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m in economics, but I&#8217;ve interviewed lots of candidates and have many friends in other fields.  It is almost universally true that the standard for junior job candidates in academia is a suit.  Most people who insist otherwise are usually other graduate students, not people who sit on lots of hiring committees.  Every stylish person should have a suit in their wardrobe anyway, so consider this an occasion to invest in one.</p>
<p>While a job interview is not a place to showcase your fashion sense, that doesn&#8217;t mean you can&#8217;t use it to your advantage.  A suit can be everything from dowdy to smashing.  The first thing is getting the right suit.  A well-cut, modern, flattering suit is the key.  This means trying on multiple suits and using a tailor. And don&#8217;t scrimp &#8211; this is an investment piece.  Cheap suiting fabric wrinkles easily, the labels don&#8217;t lie flat, and they don&#8217;t hold up well after multiple dry-cleanings.  You&#8217;ll be mixing these pieces in your professional wardrobe for years, so don&#8217;t consider this a one-time purchase.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve got the perfect suit, you can subtlely give it a little personality.  In a creative field you can get away with a pretty patterned blouse and earings.  At a B-school interview play it conservative with a fitted menswear shirt in a flattering color.  Universally great things to style a suit are a great haircut, smashing eyewear, a decent manicure, and a nice watch.</p>
<p>My two cents, M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebekah</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6938</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebekah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6938</guid>
		<description>If you squint hard enough, our outfits look alike:

http://jauntydame.com/2009/10/its-a-bird-its-a-plane/

Your Color Review posts had a big impact on my dressing, I&#039;ve started looking for more colorful accessories. 

I expected to hate the red and blue together, but it felt surprisingly good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you squint hard enough, our outfits look alike:</p>
<p><a href="http://jauntydame.com/2009/10/its-a-bird-its-a-plane/" rel="nofollow">http://jauntydame.com/2009/10/its-a-bird-its-a-plane/</a></p>
<p>Your Color Review posts had a big impact on my dressing, I&#8217;ve started looking for more colorful accessories. </p>
<p>I expected to hate the red and blue together, but it felt surprisingly good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadine</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6871</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6871</guid>
		<description>Wow, you really suit the fitted retro-sixties silhouette. Smokin&#039; hot! Love the colours and the tights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you really suit the fitted retro-sixties silhouette. Smokin&#8217; hot! Love the colours and the tights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctoressa</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6813</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctoressa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6813</guid>
		<description>What a stunning color combination.  This outfit looks perfect for your duties - hope the talk went well! 

To make this outfit interview-able in my field (history), I would wear a blazer in place of the cardigan, no belt, and black tights rather than the sweater tights. I would also probably wear closed-toe shoes.
  
However, you and all the Chics are so well-dressed and so attuned to self-presentation, I trust you three to have observed job candidates and determined the range of interview-appropriate dress in your field.  I think that the standards really can vary quite a bit by discipline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a stunning color combination.  This outfit looks perfect for your duties &#8211; hope the talk went well! </p>
<p>To make this outfit interview-able in my field (history), I would wear a blazer in place of the cardigan, no belt, and black tights rather than the sweater tights. I would also probably wear closed-toe shoes.</p>
<p>However, you and all the Chics are so well-dressed and so attuned to self-presentation, I trust you three to have observed job candidates and determined the range of interview-appropriate dress in your field.  I think that the standards really can vary quite a bit by discipline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6812</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6812</guid>
		<description>So, so, so pretty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, so, so pretty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trish</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6809</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6809</guid>
		<description>Gorgeous. Great color combination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous. Great color combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HistorySpice</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6799</link>
		<dc:creator>HistorySpice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6799</guid>
		<description>I admit that the article really irritated me.  I was happy to see that most of the reader comments expressed more or less my sentiment of exasperation that the Chronicle would run such a piece.  I also looked at the original NYT article and in neither picture did I see very much cleavage.  It also became apparent from the Times article that this woman nailed the job interview and that the other person ranking candidates was a woman.  I do think that in academia, caring about fashion is fraught with peril or atleast potential problems.  That&#039;s why I blog anonymously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit that the article really irritated me.  I was happy to see that most of the reader comments expressed more or less my sentiment of exasperation that the Chronicle would run such a piece.  I also looked at the original NYT article and in neither picture did I see very much cleavage.  It also became apparent from the Times article that this woman nailed the job interview and that the other person ranking candidates was a woman.  I do think that in academia, caring about fashion is fraught with peril or atleast potential problems.  That&#8217;s why I blog anonymously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6798</link>
		<dc:creator>N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6798</guid>
		<description>HistorySpice: I DID read that article. I was surprised at the author&#039;s reaction-- which I thought was a little extreme. The comments following the article were quite interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HistorySpice: I DID read that article. I was surprised at the author&#8217;s reaction&#8211; which I thought was a little extreme. The comments following the article were quite interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HistorySpice</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6797</link>
		<dc:creator>HistorySpice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6797</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the recent opinion piece in the Chronicle of Higher Ed about cleavage and job interviews?  While this article was not about the academic job market, it really does give one pause.  Dressing the way that you (and I) tend to in our normal day to day academic lives might not only set off the old-boy network chain reaction, but also alienate many female academics.  I always err on the side of conservatism in dress when it comes to interviewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the recent opinion piece in the Chronicle of Higher Ed about cleavage and job interviews?  While this article was not about the academic job market, it really does give one pause.  Dressing the way that you (and I) tend to in our normal day to day academic lives might not only set off the old-boy network chain reaction, but also alienate many female academics.  I always err on the side of conservatism in dress when it comes to interviewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WendyB</title>
		<link>http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6793</link>
		<dc:creator>WendyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 03:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academichic.com/2009/10/23/23-october-2009/#comment-6793</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t go wrong with a skirt like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t go wrong with a skirt like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

